資源描述:
《An Analysis of Pragmatic Failure in Cross-cultural Communication and the Countermeasures 跨文化交際中語用失誤的分析及對(duì)策》由會(huì)員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫。
1、AnAnalysisofPragmaticFailureinCross-culturalCommunicationandtheCountermeasures[Abstract]Communicationmaybreakdownduetopragmaticfailuresincross-culturalcommunication.Thispapernotonlyanalyzesthecategoriesandcausesofpragmaticfailuresbutalsoconcludeswithsuggestionsontheeffectivewaysofovercomingpragmati
2、cfailuresanddevelopingstudents’pragmaticcompetence.[Keywords]cross-culturalcommunication;pragmaticfailure;pragmaticcompetenceⅠ.IntroductionPragmaticfailurewasfirstproposedbyThomas(1983:91)torefertotheinabilitytounderstandwhatismeantbywhatissaid.Incross-culturalcommunicationpeoplefromdifferentcultur
3、esspeakthesamelanguage,buttheircommunicationmaybreakdownduetopragmaticdifferencesinwaysofthink-ing,rulesofspeaking,socialvalues,lexicalconnotationsandotherfactors.Pragmaticfailures,whicharisewhenspeakerscan’pro-tduceappropriateutterancesorcan’reachproperlytoanut-tteranceorcontext,arequitecommonamon
4、gEnglishlearnersinChina.Pragmaticfailureisnotcausedbytheaspectofwronggrammar,orinappropriatesyntax,butmainlyduetotheunsuitablespeakingmanner,orspeakingatunsuitabletimeorfailuretokeepupwiththenativespeaker’expressivehabitsorneglectingtheculturalbackgroundsofthecounterparts,etc.Suchfailuresbringabout
5、greatdifficultyforcross-culturalcommunicationandhavebecomethemaincausesofcommuni-cationfailures.Althoughbothgrammaticalandpragmaticfail-urescanledtocommunicativefailures,nativespeakersareusuallytolerantoftheformerandattributeittospeakers’in-abilitytospeakEnglishwellsinceitcanbefoundfromthesurfacest
6、ructure.However,ifamanwithfluentspokenEng-lishmakesapragmaticmistake,thehearerswillnotattributeittohislackoflinguisticcompetence,instead,theymostlyat-tributeittohisrudenessorillwill.Therefore,pragmaticfail-uresinevitablyleadtofailuresinorevenbreakdownofcom-munication.Howtoeliminateorreducepragmatic
7、failuresshouldbethefocusoflanguageresearchandlanguageteach-ing.Ⅱ.TypesofPragmaticFailureThomas(1983:91)notesthattherearetwotypesofprag-maticfailures:pragmalinguisticfailureandsociopragmaticfail-ure.Pragmali