資源描述:
《《訪談型用藥指導(dǎo)對2型糖尿病患者血糖相關(guān)指標(biāo)的影響研究》.pdf》由會員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在行業(yè)資料-天天文庫。
1、II缶Jji研究Linchuangyanjiu《中國醫(yī)學(xué)創(chuàng)新》第12卷第19期(總第337~1)2015~7fl訪談型用藥指導(dǎo)對2型糖尿病患者血糖相關(guān)指標(biāo)的影響研究孥竹碧①【摘要】目的:探討訪談型用藥指導(dǎo)對2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖相關(guān)指標(biāo)的影響。方法:回顧性分析2013年1月一2014年12月在本院診治200例T2DM患者的臨床資料,采用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法將患者分為兩組,每組各100例。對照組給予常規(guī)用藥指導(dǎo),觀察組給予訪談型用藥指導(dǎo)措施,比較兩組患者的血糟晴況。結(jié)果:干預(yù)前,兩組患者的FBG、2hBG及HbAlc水平比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>O.05);干預(yù)1個月后
2、,觀察組指標(biāo)分別為(5.82±0.42)mmo]/L、(7.41±0.66)mmo]/L、(5.38±0.32)%,對照組分別為(7.85±0.72)mmol/L、(9.63±0.64)mm0l,IJ、(7.21±0.56)%.兩組的血糖指標(biāo)均較干預(yù)前明顯改善,觀察組患者改善程度明顯優(yōu)于對照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);干預(yù)后兩組的用藥知識掌握率均較干預(yù)前明顯改善,分別為96.0%與8O.O%,觀察組的改善情況明顯高于對照組,兩組比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05
3、o結(jié)論:訪談型用藥指導(dǎo)措施能夠顯著改善患者的血糖情況,提高患者的合理用藥知曉率?!娟P(guān)鍵詞】2型糖尿??;訪談;用藥指導(dǎo);血糖波動;藥劑TheInfluenceResearchofIntenewinMedicationGuii~ilCeofRelatedIndexesforBloodGincoseinPatientswithType2DiabetesMellitus/LIZhu-yanJ/MedicalInnovationofChina,2015,12(19):054-056【Abstract】Objective:Toinvestigatetheinterviewmedi
4、cationguidefortype2diabetesmellitus(T2DM)indexinfluencingthebloodsugar.Method:Theclinicaldataofdiagnosisandtreatmentof200T2DMpatientswereretrospectiveanalyzedfromJanuary2013toDecember2014inourhospital,andrandomlydividedintotwogroupsaccordingthemethodofrandomnumbertable,100casesineachgro
5、up.Thecontrolgroupreceivedroutinemedicationguidance,theobservationgroupwasgiveninterviewmedicationguidancemeasures,thebloodsugarlevelstatisticaloftwogroupswerecompared.Result:Beforetheintervention,thedifferenceoftwogroupshadnostatisticallysignificant(P>0.05);1monthaftertheintervention,t
6、heobservationgroupindexwere(5.82±0.42)mmol/L,(7.41±0.66)mmol/Land(5.38±O.32)%,thecontrolgroupwere(7.85±O.72)mmol/L,(9.63-4-10.64)mmol/Land(7.21±0.56)%,bloodglucoseindexofthetwogroupswerecomparedwiththatbeforetheinterventionsignificantlyimproved,thepatientsinobservationgroupweresignifica
7、ntly"betterthantheimproveddegreethecontrolgroup,thediferenceswerestatisticallysignificant(PO.05);interventionoftwogroupsaftermedicationknowledgeratethanbeforetheinterven