《Instructions for Authors of Articles for Chemical Reviews化學(xué)研究物件管理局指令》由會員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫。

1、InstructionsforAuthorsofArticlesforChemicalReviewsJuly2018SharonHammes-Schiffer,EditorDepartmentofChemistry,UniversityofIllinoisatUrbana-Champaign,Urbana,Illinois61801-3364Contents(clickonthetopic)1.GeneralStatement

2、2.RequiredPreliminaryApprovalofArticles

3、3.Manusc

4、riptSubmission

5、3.1.GeneralConsiderations

6、3.2.Review-ReadySubmission

7、4.ManuscriptPreparation

8、4.1.GeneralConsiderations

9、4.2.DivisionsoftheManuscript

10、4.3.Tables

11、4.4.Graphics

12、4.5.ReproductionofPublishedTables,Figures,Charts,andOtherMaterials

13、4.6.Equations

14、4.7.Nomencla

15、ture

16、4.8.References

17、4.9.SupportingInformation

18、5.JournalPublishingAgreement

19、6.ConflictofInterestDisclosure

20、7.FundingSources

21、8.ProfessionalEthics

22、9.AuthorList

23、10.ORCID

24、11.AssistancewithEnglishLanguageEditing

25、12.ManuscriptTransferService

26、13.Honorarium

27、14.ProofandRepr

28、ints

29、15.CorrectionstoPublishedPapers

30、16.ACSAuthorChoiceOpenAccess1.GeneralStatementArticlesforChemicalReviewsshouldbesubstantial,comprehensive,authoritative,critical,andreadablereviewsofpublishedresultsonrecenttopicsinchemistrythathavenotbeencomprehensivelyandcrit

31、icallyreviewedinthepastthreetofouryears.Reviewsmaycovereithermatureoremergingareasofresearch,butnotinactiveareas.Reviewsofgeneralinterestandwithhighpotentialforbroadimpactarepreferabletonarrowlyfocusedones.Theauthorshouldbearecognizedexpertinthefield,andthescopeof

32、thesubjectareaandthetimeperiodmustbeclearlydefinedintheintroduction.Allcontributorstothesubjectshouldbeconsideredwhenselectingmaterialfordiscussion,althoughnotallwillbetreatedindepth,andtheauthor’sownworkshouldnotbesingledoutforemphasis.Thepresentationshouldbeaddr

33、essedtoreaderswhoarecompetentinfundamentalsbutneednothaveextensiveknowledgeofthetopic.AllarticlesmustbecomprehensiveinthetreatmentofthesubjectmatterwithinthescopedefinedintheIntroduction,butcomprehensivedoesnotnecessarilyimplyaspecificlengthorstyle.Reviewsshouldpr

34、ovideacriticalanalysisofthetopicandinsightsabouttheremainingchallengesandfuturedirectionsforthefield.TheFocusReviewisaspecialtypeofmanuscriptthatisdisti